Concurrent Sessions

A Concurrent Session is a 60-minute session that could be in the form of presentation, case study, discussion, panel or step-by-step presentation. The majority of sessions at SRAI meetings typically fit in this category and form the core of conference offerings. Presenters are encouraged to use active learning techniques to engage audiences, distribute materials, and respond to follow-up requests for more information. The Concurrent Sessions are marked with an "T," or "W" for the day of the week that they are presented, followed by the time slot. 

Tuesday - April 28th

10:10 AM - 11:10 AM

In the intricate world of research management, success is rarely a solo journey. Mentorship and networking together act as twin engines of professional growth: one offering guidance and resilience, the other opening doors and building meaningful connections. This session takes a fresh, engaging look at how these practices shape careers, foster collaboration across borders, and cultivate a thriving RMA community. Through real-life stories, practical tips, and a touch of humor, we will interactively explore how mentorship provides a safe space for experimentation, nurtures creativity, and accelerates learning, while networking equips professionals with the tools, mindset, and confidence to build authentic, lasting connections. Attendees will uncover the power of a gift, learn effective instruments of networking, and take away the ten do’s and don’ts for maintaining trust and professional relationships.

The session also highlights modern, flexible approaches - leveraging technology, social media, and curiosity-driven engagement - while dispelling common myths, such as the “grass is greener” illusion. Ultimately, we will celebrate mentorship and networking as dialogues, where laughter, generosity, and shared experiences spark innovation and opportunity. Participants will leave inspired with strategies to not only grow their careers but also enrich the professional journeys of others.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Apply mentorship and networking together to build adaptability, resilience, and authentic connections.
  2. Use practical tools, mindsets, and strategies to strengthen professional growth and career development

Track: Professional Development 

Leadership Certificate Required Session : LD-VI: Professional Development

Speaker(s): Floris van der Leest, Manager, Research Performance Information, University of the Sunshine Coast

This session will explore the role of the Research Development Offices (RDOs) to connect researchers and funding agencies aiming to strengthen international research collaborations —particularly between research institutions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income nations. We will present a triangular model of collaboration that builds institutional capacity and promotes equitable engagement across regions and sectors to develop research with global impact. As an illustrative case, we will draw on the final report of a British Academy-funded initiative led by Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) in Brazil, which convened regional workshops to foster dialogue among researchers, research managers and funders at local and international level. The initiative mapped structural barriers and identified strategies to overcome the challenges enhancing the role of RDOs in supporting long-term, inclusive, and transparent partnerships. Participants will gain practical insights into how RDOs can act as bridges between institutional priorities and international funding opportunities, how it can better support equityable-oriented collaboration, and how communication strategies can enhance transparency, engagement, and impact. The session will combine conceptual framing with real-world case studies and an open discussion, offering participants replicable strategies to strengthen research ecosystems and navigate the complexities of global cooperation.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Define actions to be implemented by research offices to align objectives of researchers and funders in order to support equitable and impactful international partnerships.
  2. Assess how institutional support structures—such as RDOs—can be leveraged to reduce power asymmetries, strengthen engagement in global research networks, and apply communication strategies that incr

Track: International Collaborations

Speaker(s): Goret Paulo, Director of Research and Innovation , Fundação Getulio Vargas, Tamara Marques, Coordinator of International Partnerships, Fundação Getulio Vargas

The research ecosystem in India is changing to output-driven research. From calls for proposals by funding agencies to government policies, the community is embracing this change to facilitate transfer of technologies from lab to market. These changes have necessitated the need to set-up institutional processes and frameworks to manage the research output efficiently. Many institutes for the first time have started hiring research managers, who liaise with different stakeholders, and play a crucial role in facilitating optimal utilization of the research outcomes.  
This session is focused on case studies from India, which will bring out the different aspects of how effective research management systems were set up at institutional levels to steer output-driven research in the country. The panel of speakers in this session bring together experiences from a publicly funded research institute involved in basic and applied research (Dr. Alpana Dave; Project Scientist, BRIC-National Institute of Biomedical Genomics), a privately funded research institute involved in basic, translational and clinical research (Dr. Ponnari Gottipati Associate Director- Research, LV Prasad Eye Institute), a research park focusing on industry-academia partnerships (Dr. Sneha Ranade, Head, Industry-Academia Engagements, ASPIRE, IITB Research Park Foundation) and from a science communicator (Dr. Somdatta Karak, Head, Science Communications and Public Outreach, CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology) who is actively contributing to bringing science out of the labs to the communities. 
The insights from this session will be useful for research managers & administrators from emerging research ecosystems who are in the process of setting-up processes at their institutions. This session will help them understand the various aspects of research output management and how to prioritize them according to the needs of their institute. It will also be useful for research managers & administrators from the more established ecosystems to become aware of the changes in the Indian research environment and the systems being developed, which may assist in facilitating future research collaborations. The panel will highlight insights from this broad-spectrum case study of Indian research and translational ecosystem that can be applied in the global context, helping all participants streamline their operations to enhance output-driven research. "

Content level: Basic

Learning objectives:

  1. To know about current trends in output driven research ecosystem in India 
  2. To learn the measures being undertaken for output driven research and their impact in low-resource setting 

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s): Dr. Alpana Dave, Project Scientist, National Institute of Biomedical Genomics, Dr. Ponnari Gottipati, Associate Director- Research, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Dr. Sneha Ranade, Head of Industry-Academia Engagements, ASPIRE, IITB Research Park Foundation, Dr. Smodatta Karak, Head of Science Communications and Public Outreach, CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology

Coming soon

Content level: Coming soon

Learning objectives:

  1. Coming soon
  2. Coming soon

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker(s): Karmyn Eyles, Compliance and Regulatory Subject Matter Expert, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Ashleigh Jackson, Pre/Post Award Subject Matter Expert, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Denise Clark, Associate Vice President for Research Administration, University of Maryland, Ann Holmes, Senior College Budget Officer Emeritus, University of Maryland College Park

The contemporary higher education landscape faces unprecedented challenges in managing the complex post-award grant lifecycle, where researchers increasingly find themselves overwhelmed by administrative obligations that detract from their core mission of advancing knowledge. This abstract examines the transformative impact of post-award grant management automation software on university research ecosystems, revealing how intelligent systems are revolutionizing the relationship between administrative efficiency and research productivity.


Post-award grant management automation represents a paradigmatic shift from traditional manual processes to sophisticated digital frameworks that fundamentally reshape how universities handle funded research projects. The implementation of these automated systems generates substantial benefits that cascade throughout the entire research enterprise, creating ripple effects that extend far beyond mere administrative convenience.
The most immediate and profound benefit is the dramatic reduction in administrative burden, where researchers experience liberation from time-consuming bureaucratic tasks that previously consumed weeks of valuable research time. This transformation allows faculty to redirect their intellectual energy toward groundbreaking research activities rather than navigating complex compliance requirements and repetitive data entry processes. Simultaneously, automation significantly improves data accuracy while eliminating costly duplication errors that frequently plague manual systems, creating robust data integrity that protects both institutional reputation and researcher careers.


Enhanced compliance management emerges as a critical advantage, particularly as federal regulations become increasingly stringent. Automated systems proactively track grant expenditures, ensure adherence to Uniform Guidance requirements, and prevent compliance penalties that could jeopardize future funding opportunities. This protective capability provides researchers with confidence and security, knowing their projects operate within established regulatory frameworks without constant manual oversight.
The acceleration of fund disbursement through automation dramatically impacts research timelines, enabling projects to commence more rapidly and maintain momentum throughout their lifecycle. Coupled with streamlined communication and collaboration features, these systems create transparent project environments where milestones, budgets, and team responsibilities are clearly defined and easily accessible to all stakeholders.


Automated reporting and analytics capabilities transform how institutions understand and optimize their research portfolios. These systems generate comprehensive reports effortlessly while providing valuable insights into research performance, funding patterns, and strategic opportunities. The centralization of data management creates unified information repositories that eliminate information silos and enhance institutional knowledge management.
The cumulative impact of these benefits creates operational efficiency gains that are quantifiably significant. Universities report hundreds of hours annually saved in grant administration, time that can be reinvested in research activities, faculty development, and strategic initiatives. The transformation extends beyond mere efficiency improvements to fundamental changes in how researchers experience their professional lives.


Post-award grant management automation software represents more than technological advancement; it embodies a philosophical shift toward empowering researchers to focus on their core mission while intelligent systems handle administrative complexities. My experience at Ashoka University with facts exemplifies this transformation - what began as a necessity to manage growing research portfolios has evolved into a strategic advantage that enhances our institutional competitiveness. The Media Studies and Visual Arts Departments now operate with unprecedented efficiency, where researchers express genuine excitement about project management rather than dread about administrative obligations. This transformation ultimately accelerates discovery, enhances institutional competitiveness, and creates sustainable frameworks for managing increasingly complex research funding landscapes. As universities continue embracing these technologies, the boundary between administrative burden and research brilliance continues to blur, creating new possibilities for academic achievement and societal impact."

Content level: Basic 

Learning objectives:

  1. Learn the benefits of automation in post award grant management 
  2. Learn the key process of implementation of such automation 

Track: RMA Futurescapes

Speaker: Uttkarsha, Deputy Manger - Academic Support, Ashoka University

The global research funding landscape is undergoing a fundamental shift from a focus on discovery and applied research, to research which will deliver societal benefit.  This presentation analyses this funding trend across countries including Australia, New Zealand, and Europe, using Australia's Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) as a prime example of impact-focused funding.

We present a detailed case study of how RMIT University and Impact Research Management Ltd worked with RMIT’s research community to co-design a comprehensive roadmap to respond to this evolving landscape. 

Our highly collaborative approach resulted in a shared vision which harnessed and built upon RMIT’s multi-disciplinary research culture to strengthen the potential to leverage MRFF investment.  Through the development of a practical framework and alignment with strategy, RMIT has been able to prioritise areas of focus, resources, support and engagement activities to enable attraction of funding to support the delivery of health and medical research outcomes. 

The session will share analysis of research impact driven funding landscape, lessons learnt from the co-designed methodology, potential initiatives to support research for impact, and implementation challenges. 

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. Participants will acquire actionable insights and tools to prepare their own research communities for impact-focused funding landscapes
  2. Participants will learn about stakeholder engagement strategies and framework development approaches that can be adapted to their institutional contexts.

Track: Sponsors & Funding Agencies

Speaker(s): Jane Holt, Executive Director, Research Strategy & Services, RMIT University, Rochelle Finlay, Director, Impact Research Management Ltd

The successful administration of research grants is critical for sustaining higher education institutions and Caribbean institutions often encounter significant challenges that can jeopardize grant implementation, leading to delays, underutilization of funds, and even project failure. This presentation, ‘Ensuring Grant Success: Detecting and Addressing Challenges in Higher Education Research Funding’ addresses the early warning signs of grant mismanagement and offers strategic solutions to mitigate risks associated with research funding.
This session will highlight several critical challenges faced by Principal Investigators (PIs) and institutional grant management offices. Key issues include PIs securing funding but struggling with execution, insufficient project management support, budget misalignment, rigid donor requirements, high import duties affecting procurement, and delays due to regulatory compliance. Additional concerns such as academic misconduct, legal issues involving PIs, and the lack of contingency planning for leadership transitions will also be explored.

Content level: Basic

Learning objectives:

  1. Equip attendees with practical strategies for early identification and resolution of challenges in sponsored research, focusing on budgeting, financial reporting, and risk management.
  2. Diversify Funding Portfolio to Strengthen Resiliency for Science and Innovation

Track: International Collaborations 

Speaker(s): Louri Clare, Financial Manager - Budgets & Grants Management, The University of the West Indies, PetaGaye Allen, Sponsored Research Analyst, The University of the West Indies, Sandra Gayle, Sponsored Research Analyst, The University of the West Indies

11:30 AM - 12:30 PM

The demand for skilled RMA professionals is critical, especially in regions that are emerging in the research ecosystem. This interactive session addresses the dual challenge of immediate workforce gaps and long-term capacity building by exploring practical, on-the-job strategies for upskilling RMA staff amid staffing shortages and evolving institutional demands.
 
Participants will engage with tested approaches to developing and retaining high-performing RMA teams. The session also delves into the role of cultural context—how local values, norms, and organizational dynamics influence team development, leadership styles, and capacity-building outcomes. This session offers actionable insights to help build resilient, culturally attuned RMA infrastructures whether in mature research ecosystems or in regions where talent pipelines are still emerging.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Insights into regional funding restrictions whether it be from an operations perspective or from the perspective of developing research collaborations with institutions with regional restrictions. 
  2. Build-in strategies in Sponsor, Pre-Award and Post-Award operations for research award success.

Track: Professional Development 

Leadership Certificate Required Session : LD-IV: Team Building

Speaker(s): Dr. Jaiyana Bux, Acting Associate Director Internal Programs & Research Development, Khalifa University, Cira Mathis, Director of Research Institute Strategy and Public Engagement, New York University Abu Dhabi, Aseela Al Dhaheri, Research Programs Senior Specialist, Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research

The Universidad de los Andes (Chile) is implementing Building an Open Scientific Community, a two-year initiative funded by the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID). The project aims to establish a sustainable culture of open science aligned with Chile’s Open Access Policy and international standards, addressing gaps in governance, infrastructure, training, and dissemination.


The initiative is organized around four pillars: (1) develop a governance framework and institutional policy on open science, including regulatory updates and incentives for researchers; (2) implement interoperable infrastructure to manage and preserve research data and publications; (3) deliver a comprehensive training program incorporating pedagogical strategies, specialized reference services, and ethics and integrity practices; and (4) expand visibility and networking to position UANDES in national and international open science communities, while engaging civil society.
Expected outcomes include a formalized institutional open access policy, fully operational repositories, systematic training, and active participation in global networks—strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing research visibility, and embedding open science principles across the academic community.

Content level: Basic

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify strategies for implementing governance frameworks, infrastructure, and training programs that support the adoption of open science practices within higher education institutions.
  2. Assess approaches to building institutional capacity and global networks that enhance research visibility, promote data sharing, and engage civil society in advancing open science.

Track: International Collaborations 

Speaker(s): Pia Trivelli, UANDES Open Science Project Executive Director, Universidad de los Andes, Dr. Carolina Melo, UANDES Library Director and UANDES Open Science Project Director, Universidad de los Andes

Achieving research impact where scientific findings translate into real world improvements in health, policy, and practice requires more than rigorous science. It demands strategic communication, meaningful collaboration, and strong engagement with communities and policymakers. The Medical Research Council Unit Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRCG@LSHTM) offers a compelling case study in how these elements can come together to deliver tangible outcomes, particularly in low-resource settings. The Medical Research Council Unit the Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRCG@LSHTM) exemplifies a model of achieving research impact through strategic communication and collaboration. The unit since its establishment has evolved into a premier research institution in sub-Saharan Africa, focusing on health research to save lives and improve health across the world.
1.Influence on Public Health Policy
MRCG@LSHTM's research has directly informed national health policies in The Gambia. A notable example is the introduction of the rotavirus vaccine into the country's Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) in August 2013. This decision was based on findings from an international study, involving MRCG@LSHTM researchers, which confirmed that rotavirus was a leading cause of diarrheal disease among infants in developing countries.
 
2. Enhancement of Clinical Practice
MRCG@LSHTM has facilitated improvements in clinical practice through collaborative initiatives. For instance, the introduction of a secure online teleradiology system enabled remote consultations with expert radiologists. This system has enhanced the diagnostic capabilities of healthcare providers in The Gambia, contributing to better patient care.
3. Community Engagement and Capacity Building
The unit has actively engaged with local communities to enhance health outcomes. Through the RHOST project, MRCG@LSHTM collaborated with village health workers (VHWs) to improve malaria treatment practices. Training provided by the project increased VHWs' knowledge and equipped them with necessary tools, leading to improved community health services.
4. Strengthening Regional Partnerships
MRCG@LSHTM has established strategic partnerships to bolster regional health research. Collaborations with institutions such as the Institute Pasteur de Dakar have focused on critical health initiatives, including vaccine development and clinical trials. These partnerships aim to advance health outcomes and combat diseases prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa.
The unit's collaborations extend regionally and internationally. A notable partnership with Institute Pasteur de Dakar focused on vaccine development and surveillance, addressing emerging diseases like Zika and Dengue in sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, collaborations with the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research have strengthened ties in areas such as malaria, tuberculosis, and antimicrobial resistance
5. Contributions to Outbreak Preparedness
In partnership with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the International Vaccine Institute (IVI), MRCG@LSHTM co-leads the Regional Preparedness and Response to Viral Threats in West Africa (RPPWA) program. This initiative focuses on strengthening clinical research capacity and outbreak preparedness in the region, ensuring that infrastructure developed is accessible to external stakeholders conducting clinical research.
Global health impact
MRCG@LSHTM's research is deeply embedded in community health systems. Programs like RHOST have enhanced the roles of Village Health Workers by providing training and resources, leading to improved malaria treatment and increased community trust in health interventions. The unit also operates the Gate Clinic, which serves as both a research site and a healthcare provider, treating approximately 50,000 patients annually 

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. Examine the role of communication strategies in disseminating research findings to policymakers, healthcare providers, and the public.
  2. Assess the impact of stakeholder engagement, including community involvement, in enhancing the relevance and uptake of research. 
  3. Identify key enablers and barriers to achieving research impact within the context of The Gambia and similar settings

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s): Abdoulie Sohna, Project Manager, Mrc At Lsthhm, Dembo Kanteh, Acting Head of the Research Support Office and Head of Strategic Partnership, Medical Research Council Gambia, Isatou Foon, Program Manager, Medical Research Council

Due diligence is a risk mitigation process that extends beyond merely protecting the financial resources of projects. It involves a systematic review of the institutional processes, procedures, and governance structures that ensure the integrity of research conduct. This process helps mitigate risks, promotes best practices, and provides assurance that the research institution possesses the capacity and expertise necessary to undertake the proposed research, training, or activities underpining the responsible conduct of research. This act alone sets the foundation for research compliance.
 
As the research ecosystem evolves across disciplines and borders, the role of due diligence in fostering compliance has become increasingly critical, shaping the integrity and trustworthiness of scientific and scholarly work. This process ensures that everyone involved in research is aware of their responsibility to adhere to all requirements—legal, regulatory, and guideline-based—from conception to dissemination.
 
Due diligence is carried out at various levels by different parties, making it a responsibility that can be transferred between them. The manner in which due diligence is conducted is influenced by the risk appetite of the involved institutions, as well as their reputation and standing in the environment. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the lead Research organisation to establish their risk appetite. 
 
It is now common practice for institutions to undergo a due diligence process before receiving funding for their research. For universities and research institutions in the West African region, this process can be daunting, as many of them are unfamiliar with the requirements and unable to meet the necessary criteria. The inconsistent approach to conducting due diligence, coupled with an underdeveloped research ecosystem, further complicates matters for these institutions. To address this challenge, there is a need for a consistent methodology in the conduct of due diligence, as well as recognition of the limitations faced by these institutions, with support to help them overcome these obstacles. Various initiatives have been introduced to ensure the success of due diligence processes, enabling these organisations to strengthen their systems. This session will focus on providing the owners and implementers of due diligence how the process can be improved to allow for a more effective process rather than making it a tick box exercise. 

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Develop a common understanding of the due diligence process and the challenges it poses to developing research institutions. 
  2. Identify practical steps that can be taken to support institutions undergoing due diligence successfully improve their governance systems 

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker(s): Elizabeth Batchilly, Director of Operations,  WARIMA

Artificial intelligence (AI) use in research, especially large language models (LLMs) and machine learning, is increasing at an exceptionally rapid pace.  Researchers can now immediately incorporate AI platforms and resources that are under constant and remarkably quick development.  And while research institutions know that AI holds tremendous promise for improving and accelerating research, they face substantial challenges in building both AI capacity and oversight of the ethical use of AI in research.
 
This session will first focus on capacity-building through a model where institutional stakeholders are involved in the Global Research Alliance for AI in Learning and Education (GRAILE) and the US-based Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium, while also strategically designing a large research-intensive university’s AI initiatives, focusing on innovation, education, and ethical leadership.  Under the auspices of a research administrator, the model allows for the centralization and expansion of current AI capabilities to advance research.
 
The session will then focus on the development of guidelines and policies on the use of AI in research. With little precedent and few compliance requirements, combined with an ever-evolving discourse on the ethical use of AI in research, it is particularly challenging for a research administrator to determine when such a policy is needed and what to include.  Fundamental topics for AI in research policies that will be discussed include AI authorship and citation, research misconduct, use restrictions, human research participant protections, data security, and incidental usage.

Content level: Intermediate 

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify mechanisms to improve AI capacity for researchers through an institutional framework.
  2. Describe why policies on AI use in research are needed and what they should include.

Track: RMA Futurescapes

Speaker(s): Stacy Pritt, Associate Vice Chancellor & Chief Research Compliance Officer, Texas A&M University System, Dr. Henry Fadamiro, Associate Vice President for Research, Strategic Initiatives, Division of Research, Professor, Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Texas A&M University

Populations from developing countries have traditionally been underrepresented in global clinical research, which affects clinical decision-making, creates inequities, limits knowledge about efficacy and safety, restricts local research, and impacts access.
Developing local clinical trials to close these knowledge gaps can be highly costly, often beyond the budgetary and infrastructure capacities of developing countries. The lower complexity and cost of observational research make it more feasible in lower-income settings. Despite its lower cost, accessing funds to conduct observational research in developing countries can still be challenging
Observational research can help reduce the gap and improve inclusion and representativeness by generating data from underrepresented populations, increasing equity in clinical evidence by providing real-world data that inform efficacy and safety, enabling better health decisions, and strengthening local capacity so that populations from developing countries are better represented in global biomedical innovation.
This presentation aims to share the experience of observational research funded by pharma in a middle-income country and its impact on generating data from underrepresented populations in clinical research. It is particularly useful to demonstrate how high-impact research can be conducted when the economic resources of pharma are combined with the infrastructure and other capabilities of local research centers.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Examine how observational research can address the underrepresentation of developing country populations in global clinical research.
  2. Understand the barriers pharma-funded observational research faces in closing evidence gaps in developing countries.

Track: Sponsors & Funding Agencies

Speaker(s): Dr. Luz Eugenia Pérez, Director data science and epidemiology, Biociencias SURA, Carlos Andrés Agudelo, Managing director, Biociencias SURA

In an era where transparency and research integrity are non-negotiable, ORCID’s persistent identifiers (PIDs) and provenance-rich assertions enable research organizations to move beyond hard-to-scale “identity verification” and toward “identity demonstration”, a practical, auditable way for people and systems to show who did what, where, and when. This session translates that principle into day-to-day Research Administration: pre-award (proposal routing, biosketches), post-award (reporting, effort validation), compliance (COI/COC, clinical trial registration), and scholarly communications (repositories/CRIS).
 
We’ll walk through a realistic, multi-stakeholder case (PI + departmental admin + ORIS/OSP + library/CRIS) to model how trusted affiliations, works, grants, and datasets flow into ORCID records via member integrations—creating a transparent career timeline with machine-actionable provenance. Participants will map those flows to their own systems (HR, CRIS, repository, grant eRA), identify quick-win integrations, and draft a lightweight governance checklist (consent, assertion sources, QA, KPIs). You’ll leave with templates and talking points to accelerate an ORCID-powered integrity strategy that improves discoverability, reduces admin burden, and strengthens institutional compliance—while aligning with SRAI’s emphasis on interactive, actionable learning.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Provide actionable recommendations to strengthen institutional policies and support a more robust Sponsored Research framework in Higher Education Institutions.
  2. Build an action plan that prioritizes 3 quick-win integrations or policy updates (e.g., department-level ORCID collection practice, repository push of DOIs with ORCID iDs, CRIS-to-ORCID affiliation assertions)

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s): Dr. Paloma Marín-Arraiza, Associate Director of Engagement, ORCID, Ivo Wijnbergen, Director of Engagement, ORCID

1:40 PM - 2:40 PM

Research administration is an increasingly recognized profession, with established degrees and certifications in some regions. Yet worldwide, many institutions—especially universities—must operate without such structured career pipelines. This reality requires leaders to look beyond conventional hiring pools to find and develop talent. Professionals in NGOs, community programs, government agencies, and other administrative settings often possess transferable skills that can translate seamlessly into research administration, even if the profession is not formally established in their context. This session, tailored primarily for university research administrators but relevant across sectors, explores how to recognize administrative talent in under-recognized global communities, reframe job requirements, and build inclusive recruitment pipelines that expand opportunities across borders. Through practical frameworks, and interactive exercises, participants will gain tools to strengthen their own teams by tapping into overlooked global talent and cultivating robust, diverse offices that reflect the international nature of research.

Content level: Immediate 

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify transferable skills and core competencies in diverse, non-traditional backgrounds that are applicable to research administration roles.
  2. Design inclusive recruitment and mentorship strategies that build a globally representative, resilient research administration workforce.

Track: Professional Development

Leadership Certificate Required Session: LD-IV: Recruitment and Retention

Speaker(s): Kathleen Furr, Associate Vice President for Research, Oklahoma University - Heath Campus, Rashid Khan, Research Finance Specialist, Khalifa University, Ingrid Liekens, Director of Research Services, American University of Sharjah

BRIDGE, reflects the essence of my topic, connecting researchers, communities, and institutions across borders through reciprocity, equity, and ethical engagement. In an increasingly interconnected research landscape, the ability to manage international collaborations equitably and efficiently is vital. 
 
In an increasingly interconnected global research environment, equitable collaboration is critical—but not always easy to achieve. This 60-minute interactive session—BRIDGE: Building Reciprocal, Inclusive & Diverse Global Engagements in Research—draws on the lived experience of Aga Khan University (AKU), Pakistan’s leading institution in research management, and a long-standing partner of global funders including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO, World Bank, Gavi, and Wellcome Trust.
 
Through case studies, tools, and practical dialogue, this session explores how to foster equitable international partnerships, enhance institutional research development, and navigate the cultural and ethical dimensions of cross-border research.
 
Participants will learn how AKU builds and sustains fair partnerships—across Asia, Africa, and beyond—grounded in mutual benefit, shared decision-making, and community relevance. We’ll share real-world examples of how interdisciplinary teams structure agreements, develop responsive budgets, co-author protocols, and ensure compliance with funder expectations without compromising local autonomy.
 
The session features:
 
Presentation: An overview of AKU’s research governance model, focusing on North-South and South-South equity frameworks.
 
Case Study: A maternal health project funded by the Gates Foundation, highlighting operational lessons and ethical challenges across multi-country settings.
 
Step-by-Step Guide: Walkthrough of practical tools for grant development, budgeting, MOU templates, and funder compliance.
 
Panel Discussion: Diverse voices from partner institutions across South Asia and Africa will share strategies for local capacity building and inclusive leadership.
 
Audience Engagement: Real-time polling, resource sharing, and Q&A.
 
Participants will leave with ready-to-use templates, a resource packet, and concrete ideas for embedding equity, strengthening global collaboration, and addressing cultural and ethical complexities in research management.
 
Active Learning & Takeaways:
 
Participants will:
 
Gain field-tested tools and templates to initiate or enhance global collaborations.
 
Understand how to embed equity and inclusion into research governance.
 
Leave with concrete steps to strengthen research management in diverse settings.
 
Join a growing network of institutions advancing ethical, community-centered global research.

Content level: Immediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Analyze real-world challenges and successes in managing complex collaborations.
  2. Apply key tools and templates in their own institutional settings.

Track: International Collaborations

Speaker: Ali Hussaini, Senior Grants Manager, Aga Khan University

The last decade has seen a proliferation of global initiatives that have foregrounded responsible assessment practices across various levels (research; researchers; research organisations) and domains (e.g., bibliometric use; scholarly communications; rankings; open science) of research as a critical pre-requisite to ensuring its quality, integrity and impact. In parallel, the growing emphasis on output-driven research underscores the need for assessment mechanisms that not only move beyond traditional metrics but also account for the broader societal relevance of research - recognising and incentivising diverse outputs that contribute meaningfully to local and global challenges.
 
Both issues highlight the importance of context-driven approaches to research assessment - not only in terms of the tools and resources used, but also the wider environments in which those tools are deployed. This perspective necessarily calls attention to role and influence of those institutional priorities, wider regulatory frameworks, and global initiatives like university rankings that shape how evaluation practices are understood and applied. Embedding these considerations within a broader discussion of the drivers and barriers of research evaluation offers a valuable opportunity to critically reflect on how and why assessments are used, and the benefits and challenges these pose.  
 
This session proposes an interactive discussion with conference attendees to explore what responsible research assessment looks like across diverse institutional contexts, and differentially resourced regulatory and research ecosystems. 
 
It will do so by presenting two responsible research assessment initiatives created by the International Network of Research Management Societies’ (INORMS) Research Evaluation Group. 
 
1. The SCOPE Framework – which bridges the gap between responsible research assessment principles and their implementation via a five-stage model and practical step-by-step process to help research managers, or anyone involved in planning, conducting and reviewing research evaluations.
 
2. More Than Our Rank (MTOR): developed in response to some of the problematic features and effects of the global university rankings, MTOR enables academic institutions to qualitatively and narratively highlight the various ways they serve the world that are not reflected in their ranking position. It is open to all universities, including those who are proud of their ranking but also recognize the limitations of the indicators used, and for those who feel that the rankings do not reflect their strengths or institutional mission. 
 
The session will facilitate open dialogue with attendees on the perceived benefits and challenges of these tools, particularly in the context of more publication dominant research evaluation systems. Questions will seek to establish how generalisable tools that emphasise a context-first approach can be, how they might be better adapted to support more equitable and inclusive forms of research assessment, and the types of resources that could more effectively support their adaptation to the diverse goals, outputs, and missions of research communities globally.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand how responsible research assessment principles may or may not be applied across diverse institutional contexts
  2. Identify key drivers and barriers influencing the incentivization of research assessment practices within varied regulatory and resource environments

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s): William Bramwell, Senior Policy and Networks Manager, INORMS Research Evaluation Group / Association of Commonwealth Universities

The US government expects an extraordinary level of transparency, openness, and accountability by recipients of US government research funds -- including from non-US institutions that are recipients or subrecipients of US grant funds (which is increasingly difficult). 
 
Recipient institutions have been audited and scrutinized heavily in recent years.  Current and pending US legislation also promotes intensive accountability by recipients of US federal funds.  This session centers on key audit areas and compliance exposures for non-US institutions participating in US government-funded projects.   
 
We will start the session by diving directly into 5 hot compliance areas currently on the radar for US government authorities, and which often involve non-US recipients or subrecipients: 1.  Inadequate time and effort recording; 2. Failure to obtain prior approvals for certain award activity (new collaborators, foreign components, rebudgeting, etc.); 3. Mishandling research misconduct allegations; 4. Research security, supply chain and cybersecurity; and 5. Undisclosed conflicts of interest.
 
The key take away message for the audience is the following:  compliance with US government funding policies and procedures is getting more and more difficult, and has challenged some of the most prominent research institutions in the world.  There is much to learn from experiences of peers to help improve outcomes in this area. 
 
The audience will benefit from a US perspective, particularly as international scientific collaborations have matured over time.  This is an evolving area, and US sponsoring agencies have revamped and updated expectations and guidance over the past years.   Accordingly, institutions must devote resources to keeping up with developments and improving their overall understanding of key financial and scientific elements of US government grants and contracts.  We aim to include discussion time for the audience to articulate best practices and approaches to dealing with US government requirements.

Content level: Intermediate 

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify the most salient audit and compliance areas when participating in US-government-funded projects
  2. Deploy strategies to mitigate risk of noncompliance with US government funding terms

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker(s): William Ferreira, Partner, Hogan Lovells

There is an urgent need to prioritize domestic financing and building resilient financing in strengthening health system is essential to reducing inequities and ensuring none is left behind, boost productivity, improve educational outcomes, and fuel broader economic growth through industrialization, tourism, and innovation. Yet, challenges persist, including low insurance coverage (less than 5%), inefficient resource allocation, and fragmented health systems, which continue to hinder progress.
 
The financing landscape is changing rapidly. We must now look inward and adopt reforms that ensure sustainable and dependable and comprehensive set of health financing interventions including to increase domestic resource mobilization, improve health financing efficiency, enhance equity and financial protection, and strengthen governance and financial accountability and efficiency, non-negotiable in increasing the health budget allocation from 2% to 5% of GDP, while navigating the market volatility.
 
As sustainable nontraditional financing mechanisms  is essential to navigate and challenge to external shocks, responsive to the people's needs, and rooted in national ownership continues to gain momentum on all aspects of this sector, including financial services regulations, environmental and social standards compliance, and equity and debt investments such as sustainability-linked loans, green bonds and green loans, green and social infrastructure or structuring sustainability-linked financing for corporate borrowers.

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. Charting a path toward increased non-traditional domestic financial resource mobilization, efficiency, equity, and sustainability strategic actions, to strengthen domestic financing innovative mechanisms reforms and policies.
  2. Call for action on the urgency of adopting non-traditional homegrown, sustainable solutions to government, corporate body, investors, firms, experts and policymakers, financial institutions, researcher, philanthropists, diaspora and essentially strategic.

Track: RMA Futurescapes

Speaker: Dr. Ernest Tambo, Implementation MERL and Grants Writer, University of Global Health Equity

Coming soon

This session explores the complex regulatory frameworks governing clinical trials and the export of clinical trial materials and technologies. It will address compliance challenges faced by institutions conducting international research, with a focus on navigating export controls, ethical approvals, and cross-border data and material transfers. No names suggested, but I'm sure there will be several ideas.

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker: Allen Mukhwana, Head of Programmes, Science Knowledge in Society, Science for Africa Foundation 

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

Coming Soon

The CHAIN Network is a Global South-led research collaboration focused on understanding child mortality in Africa and South Asia. Coordinated from Nairobi, Kenya, it brought together multidisciplinary teams across countries in Africa (Kenya, Uganda, Malawi, Burkina Faso), Asia (Bangladesh, Pakistan), and partners in Europe and North America. CHAIN faced and addressed several key challenges common in international research partnerships, including aligning budgets with actual work at local sites, clarifying roles across diverse institutions, ensuring inclusive and equitable decision-making, and managing power dynamics with Global North donors. Through transparent governance, locally driven priority-setting, and fair resource distribution, CHAIN maintained scientific integrity while empowering leadership from the Global South. The network offers a valuable model for future consortia aiming to build sustainable research capacity and leadership in low- and middle-income countries, demonstrating that impactful, equitable collaboration is possible when local voices are central to the research process.

Content level: Basic

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand the unique challenges faced by Global South-led research collaborations, particularly in multi-country, multidisciplinary contexts.
  2. Apply lessons from CHAIN to design or improve collaborative research models that prioritize local ownership and capacity building

Track: International Collaborations

Speaker: Martin Muthomi, Programme Manager, Strategy and Planning, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme

Research Management Offices are no longer just administrative units; they are evolving into strategic partners driving institutional excellence. This session focuses on how research offices can leverage data analytics and open science principles to strengthen decision-making and compliance—without requiring technical expertise.
Participants will explore practical strategies to transition from static spreadsheets to actionable intelligence, using dashboards to monitor proposal pipelines, success rates, ROI, and collaborations. The discussion emphasizes what to measure, why it matters, and how RMAs can lead the process, even if they are not IT specialists.
The session also introduces the emerging role of Open Data Stewards—professionals within research offices responsible for data sharing compliance, FAIR principles, and open science mandates. These roles are increasingly critical as global funders (EU Horizon, NIH, QNRF) require Data Management Plans and transparency in research outputs.
Attendees will leave with a clear roadmap for building a data-driven and compliance-ready research office, applicable to institutions across the GCC and beyond. By focusing on strategy, governance, and collaboration, RMAs can champion digital transformation and position their organizations for global competitiveness.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify key research KPIs and how they influence institutional strategy.
  2. Understand the steps to plan dashboards without technical skills. 3.Explain the importance and responsibilities of Open Data Stewards for compliance and transparency.

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s): Anu Kuriakose, Proposal Lead, Sponsored Research Office, HBKU 

Research integrity underpins trustworthy research, yet it relies not only on researchers but also on the systems, policies, and people that support them. This interactive, hour-long session explores how institutions worldwide are cultivating cultures of integrity, and what can happen when those cultures fail.
 
We begin with the core principles of research integrity - honesty, accountability, fairness, transparency, respect, and stewardship - and will examine how these translate into practice across disciplines and contexts. Participants will investigate a spectrum of research behaviours, from responsible conduct through questionable research practices (QRPs) to the most serious forms of misconduct: fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism.
 
Through case studies of high-profile integrity breaches, we will consider the ripple effects on individuals, entire disciplines, and public trust. Using Mentimeter activities, participants will actively share their perceptions and experiences, setting the stage for discussion on why institutional responses sometimes succeed — and sometimes fail.
 
Building on global frameworks, the session highlights strategies to promote fairness, openness, and responsible assessment practices across borders, addressing systemic challenges such as the replication crisis, authorship disputes, and the emergence of predatory publishers and paper mills.
 
Finally, we spotlight the pivotal role of Research Managers and Administrators. Positioned at the frontline of research, they are often the first to detect irregularities, guide responsible practices, and foster environments where integrity becomes the norm. The session closes with actionable takeaways, empowering participants to translate insights into practice within their own institutions.

Content level: Basic

Learning objectives:

  1. Evaluate research behaviours and institutional practices to identify risks and opportunities for fostering integrity across disciplines and international contexts.
  2. Apply strategies and global frameworks to promote responsible research practices and support a culture of integrity within their own institutions.

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker(s): Floris van der Leest, Manager, Research Performance Information, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sidney Engelbrecht, Senior Research Compliance Specialist, King Abdullah University of Science & Technology

Amid Lebanon’s polycrisis, AUB’s Office of Research (OR) demonstrated the ability to not only survive but to lead in institutional innovation. Through strategic resource use and dynamic capabilities, it ensured research excellence& sustainability. The session provides a roadmap for similar institutions seeking resilience and strategic advantage in challenging contexts and emphasizes the role of the OR at AUB in sustaining the institution’s research productivity, resource mobilization, and strategic positioning during ongoing simultaneous crises. It aims to examine the capacity of the AUB OR to activate and reconfigure its research-derived resources in response to crisis, assess how the OR’s internal resources (e.g., staff, processes, infrastructure, collaborative networks) function as strategic assets in ensuring continuity and analyze the application of dynamic capabilities to adapt research management strategies. Key coping strategies to secure funding, support research excellence, and maintain stakeholder engagement, will be identified, and best practices for research offices on how to operate effectively under extreme external pressure shall be exposed.

Content level: Basics

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand how strategic resource use and dynamic capabilities can be used by Offices of Research to leverage their role achieving sustainable research excellence, in spite of crises.
  2. Adopt actionable insights for enhancing operational efficiency in managing research at their institutions to remain agile and adapt to change.

Track: RMA Futurescapes

Speaker(s): May Awar, Director Sponsored Programs & Technology Transfer, American University of Beirut

Evaluating research programs is crucial for determining a program's effectiveness, efficiency, and impact, leading to informed decision-making, continuous improvement, and better resource allocation. By understanding the successes and failures of a program, decision-makers can guide future planning, resource allocation, and policy development. Evaluation provides actionable recommendations to enhance program design, delivery, and outcomes, ensuring they meet the needs of the target audience. Program evaluations demonstrate transparency and accountability to stakeholders, funders, and the public by showing the results of invested resources. Evaluation determines if a program is achieving its objectives, producing the desired results, and using its resources effectively. Insights from evaluations help identify best practices, discontinue ineffective strategies Demonstrating a program's impact and effectiveness provides a solid basis for securing continued or new funding from investors and other sources. Evaluations also allow for the collection of feedback from researchers and other stakeholders to understand their experiences and gauge the program's suitability for its intended purpose within the framework of a given institution. The Session would aim at presenting how institutions create and navigate these evaluations. Three presenters from different Institutions, would make 15-minute presentations with 15 minutes allowed for questions.

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand the importance of 360 evaluation of research programs
  2. Understand that different models of research program evaluations are available and the differences amongst them

Track: Sponsors & Funding Agencies 

Speaker(s): Dr. Luis Rizzo, Director of Research and Development, Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, Dr. Antonio Coutinho, Fundação Champalimaud, Patrice Debre, Advisor to AVIESAN, the Delegation of International Relations and the Directorate of Clinical Research and Innovation, AP-H

Know your audience and who you are messaging to; how to message and support your research and not adjusting messaging simply to secure funding; social media aspect of messaging and identifying what form of messaging is best for you; how to know what to believe and not believe in messaging 

Learning objectives:

  1. Navigate the mapping and crossroads between and among the regulatory aspects of conflict of interest, research security, other support and research misconduct
  2. Parse the differences between the regulatory investigations environment and the historical financial audit process

Track: RMA Futurescapes

Speaker(s): Denise Clark, Associate Vice President for Research Administration, University of Maryland 

4:10 PM - 5:30 PM

African research managers are operating in a dynamic and increasingly complex environment. With domestic funding becoming more competitive and international sources constrained by global budget cuts, the profession must evolve to remain strategically relevant. Research management professionals are vital to shaping equitable programmes, securing partnerships, and demonstrating the value of research and innovation across the continent. However, responses to these challenges vary widely across institutions and countries.
This presentation introduces the International Professional Recognition Council (IPRC), an Africa-led initiative that recognises and elevates research managers through a peer-reviewed, competency-based framework. By aligning professional standards with continental realities and supporting initiatives, the IPRC is building a coherent, visible cohort of skilled practitioners. The session will explore how professional recognition strengthens institutional capacity, enhances research governance, and drives innovation—ultimately contributing to a more resilient and impactful African research ecosystem.

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand the evolving role of RMAs in Africa’s research ecosystem.
  2. Gain insight into the IPRC’s recognition framework and professional designations.

Speaker(s):Pamisha Pillay, Director: Research & Consulting Services, Wits Enterprise, Karin Dyason, SARIMA, Garry Aslanyan, TDR/WHO

The rapidly changing landscape of research and research administration demands that universities and research organizations rethink and redesign their organizational structures. Emerging trends—such as the shift to remote and hybrid work models, the emergence of human-AI augmentation in research and research administration, and the need for more flexible, outcome-driven frameworks—are creating new challenges and opportunities. This panel session will explore how research organizations can adapt to these forces to ensure that they remain agile, effective, and innovative in the face of the future.
Session Format:
This 60-minute panel session will feature three presentations (10 minutes each), followed by a facilitated audience dialogue. The aim is to create a space for deep reflection and discussion on the evolving nature of research administration and the organizational structures that will support its future.
The three presentations are as follows:
1. Transforming Research Management Offices: From Traditional Hierarchies to Adaptive, Agile Structures
2. Balancing Accountability and Agility in Research Management Worldwide
3. Implementing Lean Management Systems in Research Administration
Following the presentations, a panel chair or discussant will guide a conversation with the audience. The dialogue will address key themes such as:
• Designing Future Organizational Structures: How can organizations reshape their structures to meet the evolving needs of research administration, balancing accountability and support, ensuring both agility and stability, and being effective and lean?
• Adapting to Emerging Trends:  How can research administrators adapt to these changes while maintaining effective support for researchers and projects?
Key Discussion Points:
• What does an effective, agile organizational structure look like in a post-pandemic world where remote and hybrid work models are becoming the norm?
• How can human-AI augmentation redefine the roles and responsibilities of research administrators? What's the implications on research administration structure? 
• How can research administration organizations balance the operational needs while being adaptive to the above changes needed:
o balancing accountability and support
o ensuring both agility and stability
o being effective and lean
The goal of the session is not only to share insights from the presentations but also to engage attendees in a collaborative dialogue that will offer actionable takeaways for redesigning research administration structures in their own organizations.
Optional Note: The three presentations could also be showcased as posters within the conference program, providing additional opportunities for attendees to explore these topics further.

Content level: Coming Soon

Learning objectives:

Coming Soon

Speaker(s): Hemansi , Research Administrator, Ashoka University, Amanda Breeden, Associate Chief, Research, Denver Health & Hospital Authority, Nicole Quartiero, Director, Research Project Management, Notre Dame

We are witnessing an era characterized by geopolitical instability, marked by shifting international alliances, regional conflicts, and unpredictable policy changes. This tumultuous landscape presents unprecedented challenges for the research ecosystem, affecting funding flows, international collaborations, data governance, and the mobility of talent. As we face these uncertainties, how do we continue to cultivate a sustainable and resilient RMA workforce?
 
This panel will bring together senior research managers and administrators from the USA, Europe, Africa, and India to explore effective strategies for developing a workforce adept at navigating these challenging times. Drawing on case studies from India and global best practices, the session will emphasize adaptive leadership models, capacity-building frameworks, and institutional policies that promote agility and preparedness. The session will also cover the following: 
 
• Strategic Competency Development: Training in forecasting, contingency planning, and crisis management to equip RMA professionals with the skills needed to respond effectively to unexpected challenges.
• Institutional Support Systems: Implementing flexible operational frameworks, secure remote communication systems, and automating administrative workflows to enhance efficiency and adaptability.
• Support from Regional RMA Associations: Creating sustainable cross-learning platforms and building robust networks to facilitate collaboration among RMA professionals.
• Policy Advocacy and Engagement: Strategies for engaging with and influencing national and local policymakers, fostering trust in the research management profession.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Exploring Innovative Work Practices: Understanding new methodologies in the current research environment and how they can enhance resilience.
  2. Identifying Essential Skills: Recognizing the competencies required for becoming a dynamic and adaptable research manager or administrator.

Speaker(s): Dr. Madhuri Dutta, Head Strategic Partnerships and Commissioned Research, The George Institute for Global Health, Rosemary Madnick, Vice President, Research Administration, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation

This session will take the form of a panel discussion, bringing together a diverse group of speakers and practitioners. Panellists will include representatives from EU Delegations across the Gulf, experts from academia, and contributors from the United Nations University – Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS). Together, they will explore how research management can become a strategic enabler of global engagement in a region marked by rapid technological transformation and complex geopolitical dynamics.
 
In today’s interconnected landscape, research administrators operate at the interface of science, policy, and diplomacy, where building strong cross-border relationships is essential for addressing shared global challenges. This panel will examine how research management practices can effectively support collaboration within and beyond the Middle East.
 
The discussion will focus on three key dimensions:
 
  1. Science Diplomacy in Practice: How research managers can act as bridge-builders across institutions, cultures, and geopolitical contexts, enabling trust, dialogue, and joint problem-solving.
  2. Emerging and Disruptive Technologies (EDTs): Opportunities and challenges linked to hydrogen technologies, advanced materials, renewable energy, and other critical EDTs shaping regional and global agendas.
  3. Funding Pathways for Global Engagement: Practical insights into EU programmes (e.g., Horizon Europe), EU–GCC cooperation mechanisms, regional funding initiatives, and partnership instruments supporting collaborative research, capacity building, and innovation ecosystems.
By combining case studies, policy perspectives, and on-the-ground experience, the panel will demonstrate how research administrators can leverage science diplomacy and strategic funding tools to support transformative research and build sustainable international partnerships.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand how science diplomacy practices enhance international research collaboration and explore opportunities and challenges of managing research in emerging technologies.
  2.  Gain insights into funding options available for global engagement, with a focus on EU and Middle East initiatives and learn practical strategies for fostering sustainable, trust-based partnerships across diverse research ecosystems.

Speaker(s): Dr. Luca Polizzi, Manager Strategy and Program Reviews, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Silke Blohm, Director, 4Sciences Group Ltd

Wednesday - April 29th

10:10 AM - 11:10 AM

"Research administrators face an increasingly complex landscape where traditional university systems struggle to support the agile requirements of modern research entities. This practitioner-led study demonstrates how Design Science methodology and integrative thinking can transform daily operational challenges into systematic improvement opportunities.
 
The research tackles a problem familiar to research administrators worldwide: research entities caught between the need for institutional support and the demand for operational flexibility. Traditional solutions force a choice between university affiliation (with its bureaucratic constraints) or independence (with its resource limitations). This study shows how research managers can move beyond such either/or thinking.
 
Using a structured Design Science approach, research administrators and managers at UCT’s Faculty of Health Sciences collaboratively examined these tensions through Business Model Innovation sessions. Rather than accepting existing trade-offs, the team applied integrative thinking techniques to develop a “Workaround Model” - practical solutions that preserve institutional benefits while addressing administrative inefficiencies.
 
The methodology produced concrete tools: real-time information, streamlined workflows, and automated processes. These solutions were tested through safe-to-fail experiments, demonstrating how research administrators can lead innovation within existing institutional constraints.
 
This case study provides research administrators with a replicable framework for addressing similar operational challenges while building professional capabilities in systematic problem-solving and stakeholder engagement."

Content level: Basic

Learning objectives:

  1. Practical Problem-Solving Framework: Learn to apply systematic design thinking to daily research administration challenges
  2.  Stakeholder Engagement Strategies: Techniques for facilitating collaborative solution development with researchers, faculty,

Track: Professional Development

Leadership Certificate Required Session: LD-VIII: Risk Management and Compliance

Speaker(s): Carmelita Sylvester, Centre Manager, University of Cape Town, CIDER, Jacqueline Sylvester, University of Cape Town

International scientific collaborations are essential to the development of scientific understandings and the solution of societal challenges. However, it is challenging to create and maintain effective scientific partnerships. Challenges include collaborating across time zones, distance, and languages. An additional challenge is the necessity for sufficient research management and administration capacity across participating research institutions to ensure that team members are supported as they develop research grant proposals and implement funded research.
 
Research management and administration capacities vary widely across institution types and sizes, within and between countries and continents, making it even more difficult to create and support international research collaborations. This session focuses on describing two international collaborations designed to enhance research administration capacity across diverse research institutions and regions. The first is the West African Research Innovation and Management Association (WARIMA), an association with a long history of developing, engaging and enhancing capacities around research management and administration to support regional sustainable development. The second is the international Research Administration Capacity Building at Emerging Research Institutions (ERIs) across the Americas (RACIMA) project with the objective to build bilingual research administration resource sharing and training across North and South America. WARIMA and RACIMA are collaborating to share lessons learned and resources across diverse regions.
 
This session describes how and why the collaborations were created, what they have learned about barriers to effective research management and administration within our regions, the training needs across our regions, and the types of resources we are developing and sharing to address these needs. We will share lessons learned about developing research management and administration capacities through international collaborations between researchers, research administration leaders, and research management staff.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand some of the barriers to effective research management and administration across diverse regions.
  2. Be more skillful in developing international research administration partnerships to better support international research collaborations at their institutions.

Track: International Collaborations

Speaker(s): Kathleen Halvorsen, Associate Vice President for Research, Integrity and Facilities Michigan, Eme Owoaje, Professor of Public Health, The University of Ibadan, María Cid, Director of Institutional Partnerships and Interdisciplinarity, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pete Larsen, Associate Vice President for Research, Development, Michigan Technological University

This interactive session will explore how implementation research in resource-limited settings can be translated into impactful, community-based health models. Drawing on the case study of Tele_ESSI, a school-based epilepsy intervention from India, participants will examine how research design, stakeholder engagement, and digital tools can drive real-world change. Through group activities and strategic mapping, attendees will analyze barriers and enablers to implementation and create practical pathways for translating their own research into sustainable impact. The session will emphasize actionable strategies for engaging communities, tracking outcomes, and aligning academic research with societal needs—especially in the context of global health disparities. Participants will receive a digital toolkit to apply these approaches in their own institutions or collaborations.

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. Describe strategies for designing and implementing impact-driven research in low-resource settings.
  2. Identify enablers and barriers to community-based neurological or NCD intervention scale-up and apply a structured mapping tool to link research outputs with real-world societal impact.

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s):Sulena Sulena, Doctor, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, 

This session will explore the evolving landscape of research security and dual-use technologies through a comparative lens, examining legal and policy frameworks across Asia, Latin America, Europe, Africa, and the United States. Participants will gain insights into how different regions define and regulate dual-use research, manage institutional risks, and balance scientific openness with national security imperatives. The discussion will highlight best practices and emerging trends to help research managers navigate compliance and foster responsible international collaboration.

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker(s): Coming Soon

The Clinical Research Enterprise (CRE) was established six years ago as a small, shared service team with just 8 staff members, supporting 3 divisions within the Department of Medicine. Today, our team has grown to nearly 60 staff, now providing comprehensive support to 6 divisions within the Department of Medicine and 8 additional departments across the Heersink School of Medicine. As our scope of work expanded, the traditional methods of tracking and reporting clinical trial activities became insufficient. With over 100 Principal Investigators under our purview, it became imperative to develop a more efficient and streamlined approach to managing and communicating trial data. 
While most institutions utilize clinical trial management software, these systems often have multiple potential failure points and rarely provide all pertinent details. As clinical trial management has become increasingly nuanced, with multiple vendors involved in study startup, the need for transparent and accurate tracking has become more complex. To address these challenges and meet industry demands, we leveraged free, open-source tools to automate and enhance data tracking. This initiative has not only reduced inefficiencies and staff frustration but has also empowered investigators and leadership with clearer, more accurate insights into their clinical trial portfolios. The result has been a marked increase in confidence and improved communication between our shared service team and the divisions and departments we support.
By integrating these open-source tools with our institution's existing clinical trial management software, we have created resources that can be developed and managed by clinical trial administrators, regardless of their technical expertise. These tools have been successfully implemented within our large, shared service team, the Clinical Research Enterprise (CRE), to support the six divisions and eight departments we currently collaborate with. We believe these resources can be adopted in full or in an ad-hoc manner to benefit administrators across a variety of settings.
These resources have been well received by divisional and departmental leadership, investigators, and our clinical trial support staff. We have successfully reduced the time spent on administrative tasks while providing greater transparency to our collaborators. This has enabled the CRE to operate more efficiently and deliver excellent customer service through an easily reproducible, scalable, and cost-free platform.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify and utilize cost-effective data management tools to enhance research efficiency
  2. Implement automation techniques using scripts and AI tools to reduce manual workload.

Track: RMA Ruturescapes

Speaker(s): T. Patrick Frazier, Director of Clinical Research, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Robert Adkins, Clinical Research Administrator II, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Sarah Houston, Research Nurse Manager, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Cindy Joiner, Vice Chair Research Operations & Development, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Jane Vines, Research Nurse Coordinator III, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Navigating research funding in regions where the research ecosystem presents unique operational challenges, that require tailored sponsor office strategies. Unlike many global contexts, funding mechanisms within the Middle East for example, often impose various restrictions such as fiscal period restrictions, prohibiting carryover and demanding precise financial planning and execution. This session explores how Sponsor, Pre-Award and Post-Award offices can proactively address regional constraints to facilitate successful research awards.
 
Drawing on real-world examples from Middle Eastern institutions, we will examine sponsor planning techniques, award setup protocols, and operational workflows that align with regional funding models. Attendees will gain insights into how sponsor offices can collaborate with researchers to anticipate hurdles, optimize budget structures, and ensure timely project delivery. The session also highlights the importance of cross-functional coordination including with Pre-Award and Post-Award teams, building resilient research support systems. This session offers practical guidance for turning regional constraints into opportunities for research excellence.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Insights into regional funding restrictions whether it be from an operations perspective or from the perspective of developing research collaborations with institutions with regional restrictions. 
  2. Build-in strategies in Sponsor, Pre-Award and Post-Award operations for research award success.

Track: Sponsors & Funding Agencies

Speaker(s): Jaiyana Bux, Acting Associate Director Internal Programs & Research Development, Khalifa University

The session will be a case study identifying key research priorities and aligning them with institutional goals. The session will walk attendees through the process of: engaging with stakeholders, defining measurable outcomes, and the methodologies for resource allocation for developing and implementing an organizational research strategy. Using real world examples from academic medical centers; attendees will understand how developing a research strategy that the meets the needs of the community and is understood by the community and can impact both the organization and the local community. 

Content level: Advanced 

Learning objectives:

  1. Develop a Research Strategy
  2. Communicate a Research Strategy to the community

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s): Marcos Garza, Assistant VP of Research Operations, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine

11:30 AM - 12:30 PM

XXXXXXX

Content level: Xxxxxxx

Learning objectives:

  1. Xxxxxxx
  2. Xxxxxxx

Track: Xxxxxxx

Speaker(s): Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx

Across the world, research support staff are navigating rapidly evolving expectations, emerging competency frameworks, and a growing demand for structured professional development. This session brings together four international perspectives that collectively illustrate how professional pathways for Research Managers and Administrators (RMAs) are being designed, implemented, and scaled across diverse research ecosystems.
From global training frameworks and modular capacity-building programmes to immersive fellowships and institution-level initiatives, this panel provides a cohesive view of how structured development models can support RMAs in different roles, institutions, and settings. 

Presenters from Northern Europe, Central and East Africa, and India will share practical insights into approaches ranging from competency-based training and Trainer-of-Trainers models to immersive mentorship, placements, and local communities of practice.

Following brief lightning talks, a moderated panel discussion will explore points of complementarity across these models, differences in regional needs, and lessons learned for building scalable, culturally responsive, and sustainable professional development pathways. The session will conclude with Q&A, inviting delegates to reflect on how global models can be adapted to their institutional and national contexts.

Participants will leave with a clearer understanding of the variety of structured professional development options available globally, and with practical ideas to inform capability building, training strategies, and workforce development within their own organizations.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Compare diverse professional development models and approaches for Research Managers and Administrators, and gain insights into how elements of these models can be adapted to your own context.
  2. Apply practical principles from international case studies to design or strengthen scalable, sustainable, and culturally responsive professional development pathways within your institution.

Track: Professional Development

Speaker(s): Olaf Svenningsen, Independent Research Advisor, Research Lighthouse, Ellen Schenk, Research Funding Advisor, DrEAMS Funding Consultancy, Luke Banda,Senior Project Manager, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Programme, Melissa Nakiyaga, Grants Officer Makerere University, School of Public Health, Jackie Nakabira, Makerere Lung Institute, MLI, Ivan Mutyaba, Departmental administrator and UASP fellow, Makerere University, Martina Savio, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, LSTM, Shruti Srivastava, Senior Manager Ashoka University 

Moderator: Floris van der Leest, Manager, Research Performance Information, University of the Sunshine Coast

 

The globalization of research and the increasing complexity of the funding environment have underscored the importance of international collaboration, particularly for advancing research administration in Africa. The Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research has a long-standing collaboration with the Yale University since 2007. This collaboration has not only led to scientific exchange programs but has also led to the training of research administrators at the Yale Office for Sponsored Projects. This presentation will focus on the multifaceted impact of the Noguchi-Yale collaboration on funding mechanisms, capacity building, and policy alignment for Noguchi. The presentation will also highlight how the collaborations have facilitated knowledge transfer through exchange program, enhanced administrative efficiency, and fostered sustainable research management at Noguchi. Finally, the presentation will also discuss how the collaboration led to funding from NIH for two G11 capacity building grant, and significantly strengthened research administration in Noguchi, despite the cultural differences.

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. List the importance of international collaborations and partnerships.
  2. State the necessary steps to take to establish and sustain international collaborations. 

Track: International Collaborations

Speaker(s): Griselda Osae Amoako, Principal Research Administrative Assistant, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Nana Oye Akuffo, Senior Research Development Officer, University of Ghana

As a young nation, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has leveraged its agility to position itself on the global stage with a future-driven vision. National research priorities emphasize applied research and industry-driven challenges rather than basic sciences, aligning with ambitious technology agendas. The UAE has emerged as a leader in government-level AI implementation and is rapidly establishing itself as a healthcare research hub, supported by streamlined regulatory processes that enable accelerated go-to-market strategies. These developments are reshaping the role of higher education institutions, influencing how they define their research mandates and compete for funding. This session examines the implications of these shifts for research management in the UAE, highlighting opportunities and challenges in aligning institutional strategies with national innovation priorities.

Track: Output Drive Research

Speaker(s): Coming Soon

As research becomes increasingly globalised and collaborative, data privacy regulations present both challenges and opportunities for international research partnerships and open science initiatives. This panel brings together experts from three distinct regulatory environments to explore how different approaches to data protection shape research practices and cross-border collaboration.
The session will examine the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which has established comprehensive data protection standards affecting research data sharing and international collaborations. We will explore Brazil's Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD), which demonstrates how emerging economies are developing their own frameworks whilst engaging with global research networks. Finally, we will consider approaches in the United Arab Emirates and wider Middle East region, where data protection frameworks are evolving rapidly, including the UAE's Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on Personal Data Protection, Qatar's Personal Data Privacy Law, and Saudi Arabia's Personal Data Protection Law.
The panel will address key questions facing research administrators and institutions: How do differing regulatory requirements impact international research collaborations? What practical challenges arise when transferring research data across jurisdictions with varying privacy standards? How can open science principles be reconciled with data protection obligations? What strategies can institutions employ to facilitate compliant cross-border research whilst maximising openness and impact? By comparing three distinct regulatory approaches, this session will provide attendees with practical insights for managing data privacy compliance in international research projects and help shape more effective policies that balance protection with the collaborative imperatives of modern research.
 

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand how regional variations in data protection frameworks impact international research collaboration and open science practices.
  2. Identify practical strategies for managing cross-border data transfers and compliance requirements across different jurisdictions.

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker(s): Goret Paulo, Director, Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Rob Johnson, Managing Director, University of Nottingham

"The evolution of research management increasingly relies on emerging technologies to simplify workflows, enhance compliance, and support evidence-based decision-making. At the Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia (MRCG) at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, high staff turnover within the Research Support Office posed challenges to business continuity and effective grant management. To address this, the unit developed REMSYS (Research Management System), a centralized platform designed to strengthen operational efficiency, accountability, and institutional memory.
 
Methods / Implementation
This session presents a case study of integrating REMSYS into departmental workflows as an example of digital transformation. REMSYS supports the complete project lifecycle: pre-award (grant application, budgeting, negotiation, reporting, and closure), award notification, and post-award (financial tracking, performance monitoring, reporting, project close-out, and electronic document repository). The integration automated compliance checks, streamlined reporting, and improved operational visibility across projects and grants.
 
Outcomes
Implementation demonstrated measurable benefits, including increased efficiency, data accuracy, and transparency. Challenges emerged around staff acceptance, training, and alignment with existing policies and institutional frameworks.
 
Conclusion
By sharing lessons learned, this session equips research managers with practical strategies for embedding digital tools responsibly and sustainably. Participants will gain insights into how systems like REMSYS can future-proof research management functions while balancing innovation, ethical considerations, and governance requirements—ultimately enhancing efficiency, accountability, and operational oversight in research administration."

Content level: Intermediate 

Learning objectives:

  1. Gain practical strategies for embedding digital tools responsibly and sustainably.
  2. gain insights into how systems like REMSYS can future-proof research management functions while ultimately enhancing efficiency, accountability, and operational oversight in research administration.

Track: RMA Futurescapes

Speaker(s): Caroline Potin-Sambou, Program Manage, MRC Unit Gambia, LSHTMr

"The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region is rapidly expanding its investment in research and development, creating significant opportunities for global academic collaboration and innovation. This panel brings together representatives from leading national funding agencies and research foundations across the GCC to demystify the regional funding landscape. Designed for research administrators, grant writers, and institutional leaders, this moderated discussion will provide practical insights into securing support for projects within and outside the region.The panel will address crucial questions, including the structure of recurring, multi-year funding mechanisms; specific eligibility requirements for international and regional Principal Investigators (PIs); current and emerging research focus areas; and proven strategies for establishing successful cross-border collaborations that are attractive to GCC-based funders. Attendees will gain a clearer understanding of how to align their proposals with the strategic R&D visions driving research investment in the Gulf.
Objectives/Outcomes:
1. Clearly articulate the current research priorities and available funding instruments of key GCC agencies to an audience of global research administrators
2. Provide actionable guidance on optimizing proposal alignment and fostering effective institutional partnerships to maximize GCC funding for R&D."

Track: Sponsors & Funding Agencies

Speaker(s): Coming Soon

This session will unpack timely and emerging concerns in the oversight and ethical governance of human subjects research, with a focus on how regulatory frameworks are evolving regionally and internationally in response to scientific innovation, geopolitical shifts, and societal demands for accountability and equity. Session speakers can examine recent developments in data privacy laws, emerging technologies, big data, and/or Indigenous Knowledge Systems and community-based research. 

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker: Lama Choufani, Assistant Director, Research Ethics and Governance, New York University Abu Dhabi

1:40 PM - 2:40 PM

This presentation examines how research administrators, leaders, and support offices can effectively navigate periods of financial uncertainty and organizational volatility while also addressing the growing challenge of change fatigue within research institutions. Participants will gain insight into how shifting funding environments and government mandates contribute to organizational “whitewater,” often resulting in change fatigue. Through shared strategies and active discussion, attendees will learn approaches for developing resilient employees and strengthening institutional support structures. By integrating resilience-building practices with agile research management, this session will equip attendees with tools to maintain research momentum and support their teams amid ongoing and future change.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Participants will identify key drivers of rapid change and coping mechanisms to stabilize research programs. 
  2. Participants will learn the tools to develop a personalized/organizational resilience plan. 

Track: Professional Development

Leadership Certificate Required Session: LD-I: Change Management/LD-VII: Employee Engagement (Culture)

Speaker(s): Lakeisha Wilson, Senior Program Administrator, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Elizabeth Demski, Assistant Provost and Director of Sponsored Research, Wellesley College,

Since early 2023, the University of Oxford and OUCRU Indonesia have been collaborating with local trial sites in Indonesia to prepare for a Phase II malaria vaccine trial — the next step following Phase I research in the UK. 
 
Establishing this international trial required navigating complex administrative, regulatory, and cultural landscapes. OUCRU Indonesia, administered by the University of Oxford, acted as the sponsor’s representative in-country, managing key processes including site selection, timelines, budgeting, and securing local ethics approvals, while maintaining continuous communication with the University of Oxford. 
 
From the UK side, the University of Oxford sought funding from multiple sources, working closely with Indonesian partners to finalize the protocol, prepare the combined budget, and present cohesive funding application. Progress was shaped by dependencies on Phase I completion and the necessary lead time for trial initiation in Indonesia. 
 
The collaboration prioritised fairness, transparency, and shared decision-making, ensuring alignment between all parties before commitments were made. Cultural and ethical considerations were integral to trial planning — from engaging local communities to recruiting locally based clinical staff who understand patient contexts.  
 
This case study highlights practical strategies for building impactful, compliant, and culturally sensitive research collaborations across borders — offering insights for funders, sponsors, compliance officers, and government stakeholders. 

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Gaining a deeper understanding of the factors that influence the establishment of international collaboration, particularly across diverse contexts.
  2. Developing more effective plans when establishing international collaboration

Track: International Development

Speaker(s): Trang Vo, Senior Grants Officer, University of Oxford

African research universities increasingly rely on cross‑border RMA partnerships to mobilize resources, harmonize procedures, and scale research impact. Strategic science communication converts these collaborations into trust, visibility, and uptake by government, industry, and communities. The focal problem states that fragmented policies, uneven RMA capacity, and limited engagement with end‑users reduce the uptake of research outputs. Messages are often technical, untimely, or poorly aligned with decision cycles. Objectives:(1) Align communication with national development priorities. (2) Standardize RMA information flows across partners. (3) Translate evidence for policy and public audiences. (4) Build capacity for media, data storytelling, and stakeholder engagement. Methodology adopted a Systematic Literature Review and Policy Analysis): A structured review of 2015–2025 African RMA/HE policies and peer‑reviewed studies; screening, thematic coding, and triangulation with continental frameworks informed the synthesis. Best practices include the use of co‑created communication plans; designating RMA liaison officers; adopting open‑access repositories; and monitoring communication KPIs linked to project logframes. Lessons learned considered early stakeholder mapping reduces friction; plain‑language summaries increase media pickup; rapid‑response briefs timed to policy windows improve influence. Case studies examined East Africa: joint data‑sharing MoUs accelerated ethics approvals and cross‑site trials. West Africa: a multi‑university press office produced bilingual briefs, doubling policy citations. Audience‑segmented products (policy briefs, infographics, radio spots), an editorial calendar synced to national events, and a crisis‑communication protocol; dashboarding of reach, sentiment, and uptake. Tentative results have indicated that partnerships reported shorter grant cycles, higher media visibility, and clearer compliance; policy dialogues evidenced improved evidence uptake. In conclusion, international cooperation, when paired with disciplined RMA communication, improves legitimacy, coordination, and societal impact. It is highly recommended that institutionalize RMA communication units; fund shared repositories and data standards; mandate plain‑language outputs; embed KPI‑based monitoring; support multilingual outreach.

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand the Process of Leveraging International Cooperation for Science Communication Strategy in National Research Management Administration (RMA) Partnerships in African Research Universities
  2. Appreciate the role of science communication in promoting research communication by university academics in Africa and globally

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s): Dr. Wilson Okaka, Professor, Kyambogo University, Aminah Namugenyi, PhD  Scholar, Kyambogo University

 As research institutions increasingly emphasize innovation, entrepreneurship, and translational science, the push to bring discoveries from the lab to the marketplace has introduced new complexities in the realms of research regulation and compliance.  This session explores the evolving role of research compliance offices in supporting—and regulating—the pathways through which research leads to technology transfer, startup formation, and industry partnerships.

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker(s): Coming Soon

This session presents a case study of the $25M NFRF-T (New Frontiers in Research Fund – Transformation) grant. This is a large-scale six-year grant, 40+ international co-investigators and collaborators, 13 Universities and research organizations across the globe. It will highlight how research finance teams can move from static reporting to AI-assisted decision support.
 
Aligned with the RMA Futurescapes track, the session demonstrates how technologies—including Business Intelligence ( BI) dashboards, n8n workflow automation, and forecasting tools—can transform research administration practices. Participants will see how AI automated reporting pipelines (pulling financial and subaward data), enabling near real-time updates in Power BI and seamless delivery of custom reports to international partners.
The case study emphasizes the unique challenges of international cooperation: harmonizing financial data from multiple countries, aligning compliance frameworks, and enabling timely collaboration across borders. Practical strategies will be shared on how to operationalize these tools, embed ethical guardrails, and build finance workflows that actively strengthen partnerships and accelerate research outcomes.
Attendees will leave with an applied roadmap for turning financial data into actionable insights, along with concrete practices to integrate AI, BI, and workflow automation into the future of international research management.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Understand how AI workflow automation can be applied to financial management in large international research grants, using the NFRF-T case study as an example.
  2.  Identify key strategies for operationalizing financial intelligence across borders, including forecasting and automated reporting to strengthen international collaboration and turning data into decisions.

Track: RMA Futurescapes

Speaker(s): Anna Kalakutskaya, Associate Finance Director, FOFA Concordia University

 

There is an urgent challenge that granting councils must address regarding how to select fundable research proposals. The current tradition of choosing funding proposals relies heavily on review reports from external reviewers. While this method is effective, it faces significant challenges, especially in developing countries where there is a limited number of reviewers. This limitation is often exacerbated by a decline in ethical standards among reviewers. 
 
This decline may stem from various motivations behind the review process. Some reviewers are driven to conduct thorough evaluations for their career advancement, while others may participate merely because it is a requirement of their institution. Additionally, some reviewers may be motivated by the fees associated with the review process. These factors can negatively impact the quality of evaluations, ultimately affecting the selection of viable research projects. 
 
In certain cases, it has become increasingly common for granting councils in developing countries to receive review reports with scores that do not accurately reflect the quality of the research proposal. There are instances where strong research proposals receive low scores, while weaker proposals score higher. Due to existing granting procedures, many developing countries do not allow for questioning the reviewers' results; they simply accept them as they are. This practice has led to the funding of less impactful proposals while overlooking more significant research endeavors.
 
To address this issue, we propose a new quality check procedure for selecting proposals for funding. We recommend that, before sending proposals to external reviewers, the granting council should organize an internal review committee meeting with relevant experts. This committee can review the proposals, ensuring they align with the thematic areas of the call for proposals and the council's interests. The committee would then select a substantial number of research proposals deemed impactful and provide guidance for further evaluation by external reviewers. This approach could resolve the dependency on sometimes ineffective review reports, leading to better funding decisions for high-impact research proposals. 

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Strengthen the selection process of research proposal for funding by the global research councils.
  2. Learn on how to strengthen the selection process of research proposal for funding by the global research councils.

Track: Sponsors & Funding Agencies 

Speaker(s): Philbert Luhunga, Chief Research Officer, Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology

Coming Soon

3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

The MORU-OUCRU Discovery Research Academy (MODRA) is a leadership training programme targeted at early career post-doctoral researchers in South and Southeast Asia.  MORU and OUCRU are Wellcome-funded Major International Programmes, and part of the University of Oxford overseas diaspora.  We realised that MODRA cohort members from MORU and OUCRU enjoy comparatively huge amounts of research management support, whereas members from less well-resourced organisations can struggle to meet even the most basic due diligence requirements of funders and international collaborators - which is a major barrier to equitable participation in the research landscape.  
 
In response to this, we have conducted a pilot study to understand the research support deficit in this region, and design low-cost interventions that might help researchers and research organisations build their capacity, utilizing the expertise present in the MODRA network.  This presentation will discuss what we have learned doing this project, and open discussion to the audience. 

Content level: Advanced

Learning objectives:

  1. Describe the research administration and management landscape in LMICs in South and Southeast Asia
  2. Understand capacity building strategies that can enhance equitable partnership between well-resourced, and less well-resourced research organizations.

Track: Professional Development

Speaker(s): Katrina Lawson, Grants and Communications Manager, Oxford University, David Gandy, Grants and Contracts Manager, Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Diana Janizar, Senior Grants and Contracts Administrator, OUCRU

Coordinating large complex grants is a challenging task. But as multinational grants becoming the norm, program managers and research administrators must rethink traditional communication channels to deliver capacity strengthening initiatives effectively and ensure knowledge and resources flow seamlessly across institutions. This particularly holds true for research administrators based in the global south who can leverage new models of communication to advocate and work towards ensuring equity in global health research collaborations.  
 
In this session, we draw on our experience of coordinating a diverse cohort of five institutions across four countries to share emerging best practices for strengthening communication. We will showcase qualitative and quantitative tools we use to track process efficiency and demonstrate how these can be adapted to different institutional contexts. 
 
Participants will also take part in a 20-minute peer-learning activity using a discussion table format, identifying common communication challenges and sharing practical solutions. Together, we will enrich our collective lexicon of strategies for improving communication across large, complex grants.

Content level: Basic

Learning objectives:

  1. Learn how to build a strategy to deliver an efficient RCS (research capacity strengthening) and knowledge exchange program embedding trust building, team building and effective communication
  2. Understand the use of dashboards for tracking performance and internal communication and process metrics

Track: International Collaborations

Speaker(s): Sarah Iqbal, Research Manager George Institute for Global Health, Aakanksha Mehrotra, Project Manager (Research Capacity Strengthening), George Institute for Global Health

A decade if research impact at the University of Limerick, Ireland Since 2014, University of Limerick (UL) has been growing its research impact program to become a cornerstone of organizational strategy and identity. A national leader in the research impact agenda, UL’s Research Impact program is in line with international best practice (OECD 2017). Through this program, we have developed a library of case studies demonstrating our excellent research and its impact across a range of sectors. We continue to evolve how impact is recognized. Key initiatives include the President’s Research Excellence and Impact Awards recognizing outstanding research collaborations, early-career researchers and research outputs. Our research impact program has been enhanced to include mechanisms to support and enhance the impact journey across all career stages, including case study development, public engagement activities, Research Week, and our awards scheme.
In this presentation Christine Brennan, Research Strategy and Policy Manager, Yvonne Kiely, Research Impact Officer UL will provide an overview of how organizational strategy was realized and sustained by forging synergistic collaborations between academics and professional staff.
We share what we’ve learned across strategic planning, case study development, staff research awards, research communications and engagement activities and highlight how global agendas such as reform of research assessment, Open Science have shaped the journey for the better.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify factors which are critical for building research impact/knowledge valorization into organizational strategy
  2. Highlighting the role RMA can play in the impact agenda and the skills which are central to this.

Track: Output Driven Research

Speaker(s): Yvonne Kiely, Research Impact Officer University of Limerick, Christine Brennan, Research Strategy and Policy Manager, University of Limerick

In a world of trade wars, kinetic wars, funding instability, ethical research and security concerns, how does an institution maintain and ensure successful research collaborations across national borders. What are the top risks facing international research today and what tools we can use to mitigate those global risks? From dollars to data and the ethical quandaries in between, this session will use a discussion/case study format to identify top risks facing research in different countries and identify solutions to navigate those risks.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify up to five top risks in international research
  2. Identify tools and options to mitigate risks in international research

Track: Regulatory Landscapes

Speaker(s): Cindy Kiel, Chief Conflicts Officer, Stanford University

 

With the growing trend of AI's engagement in various professions, professionals across the World are in a state of dubiousness. Same goes for Research Administration as a profession. Research Administrators and faculty members need to think ahead and plan for the integration of AI into research and grants administration and hence this study aims to study the perceptions of investigators and research administrators in AI replacing the role of research administrators in three countries (Canada, United Arab Emirates, and Pakistan). This multi site study, through a self administrated questionnaire will ask specific questions from investigators and research administrators to understand their perceptions, apprehensions, concerns and then analyze the data using selected Focus Group Discussions with a sub-sample. The study will be completed by Feb 2026.

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Identify how investigators and research administrators perceive AI might or might not replace the role of research administrators
  2. Understand how these perceptions would help the research administrator community prepare for the future

Track: RMA Futurescapes

Speaker(s): Sajjad Surani, Research Administrators, University of Calgary, Mir Asghar Ali Khan, Consultant and Former Director Research, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Muhammad Rashid Khan, Finance Specialist, Khalifa University

Co-presented with Dr. Kiki Caruson, Vice President of USF World on the impact of international scholars, a thought leader for academic and global audiences on economic resiliency, our subject matter experts speak to the risks and best practices for countering the strain facing global research management. Acknowledging global competitiveness, unpacking ERASMUS funding and providing practical insights to diversified funding portfolios as well as fresh ideas that reflect and respond to the dynamic global research environment. 

Content level: Intermediate

Learning objectives:

  1. Strategies to Bridge the Unmet Demands for Sustainable funding of Global Research
  2. Diversify Funding Portfolio to Strengthen Resiliency for Science and Innovation

Track: Sponsors & Funding Agencies

Speaker(s): Sandra Justice, Director, University of South Florida, Dr. Kiki Caruson, Vice President, USF World, University of South Florida

4:10 PM - 5:30 PM

Coming Soon