This workshop targets a central challenge for pre-award research managers: how to support researchers in writing successful, competitive funding applications. Drawing on a structured framework used in peer-review panels and proposal development coaching, the workshop explores what sets funded proposals apart from rejected ones.
During the workshop participants will work with real successful and unsuccessful grant applications (anonymized), to gain deeper insights into the key features that influence reviewers’ decisions. Using an established set of guiding questions and reviewer criteria, participants will learn how to critically analyze proposals, provide constructive feedback, and guide researchers through effective revisions.
We also explore how generative AI can be used responsibly and effectively in the context of proposal development: not as a replacement for expert judgment, but as a support tool to identify linguistic weaknesses, structural gaps, and areas where clarity, novelty, or impact could be enhanced.
Target Audience: Pre-award research managers and advisors involved in proposal development support.
Content level: Basic
Learning objectives:
- Identify the most common features that distinguish successful from rejected research proposals
- Practice providing evidence-based, constructive feedback to researchers
Track: Sponsors and Funding Agencies
Speaker(s): Anders Wennstroem, Director and CEO, Profectus Academy, Dr. Folmer Bokma